MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4285400135 · doi:10.1149/ma2022-01152379mtgabs

C3N4 and C3N5 Nanosheets As Passivation Layers and Carrier Extractors for Inorganic Semiconductor Nanowires and Quantum Dots

2022· article· en· W4285400135 on OpenAlexaff
Kazi M. Alam, Pawan Kumar, Devika Laishram, Charles Jensen, Annabelle Degg, Narendra Chaulagain, Frank A. Hegmann, Tom Nilges, Rakesh Kumar Sharma, Karthik Shankar

Bibliographic record

VenueECS Meeting Abstracts · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicQuantum Dots Synthesis And Properties
Canadian institutionsUniversity of CalgaryUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPassivationQuantum dotNanowireMaterials scienceOptoelectronicsSemiconductorCharge carrierNanotechnologyMonolayerLayer (electronics)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Inorganic semiconductor nanowires and quantum dots made of chalcogenides, III-V semiconductors and halide perovskites offer exciting potential for optoelectronic devices. The orthogonalization possible in nanowires between the normally competing processes of charge generation and charge separation have been used to project very high operating performance exceeding that of thin films and single crystals in light harvesting devices such as solar cells, photodetectors, photocatalysts and photoelectrolyzers. Likewise, inorganic quantum dots with size-tunable absorption and emission spectra are excellent candidates for light emitting devices as well as light harvesting devices. However, the practical performance of inorganic nanowire based optoelectronic devices has significantly lagged theoretical predictions. A major reason for the discrepancy between theory and experiment is the presence of surface traps and defects in nanowires and quantum dots, which exhibit a large surface area to volume ratio. Several chemical treatments and annealing regimens have been employed to heal surface defects in nanowires and quantum dots. One popular strategy involves wrapping nanowires and/or quantum dots with a thin coating of a molecular monolayer (e.g. alkanethiols) or an atomic layer deposited conformal oxide. While such core-shell architectures are frequently effective in reducing surface defects, the surface passivation is invariably accompanied by a deterioration in optoelectronic properties due to the difficulty experienced by charge carriers in tunneling through the thin shell layer. The resulting trade-off between surface passivation and carrier extraction limits performance improvements in light harvesting devices. Thus there is a strong need for passivating layers that do not negatively impact carrier extraction. Herein, we show that graphitic carbon nitride coatings are highly effective in passivating the surfaces of inorganic nanowires and quantum dots while preserving excellent carrier transport and extraction. Three illustrative examples are provided together with in-depth spectroscopic and electrical characterization: (1) Cesium lead bromide (CsPbBr3) quantum dots passivated by g-C3N4 nanosheets and performing spectacularly as CO2 photoreduction catalysts and water-splitting photoanodes (2) The double helical ternary semiconductor SnIP passivated by g-C3N4 nanosheets which experienced a remarkable improvement in photoelectrochemical performance (3) Cadmium sulfide (CdS) nanowires passivated by C3N5 nanosheets resulting in a superior photocatalytic performance

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.034
Threshold uncertainty score0.764

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.239
Teacher spread0.218 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueECS Meeting AbstractsSame topicQuantum Dots Synthesis And PropertiesFrench-language works237,207