Carbon Neutralization: The exploration of clean energy and ecological environment to achieve low carbon emission
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Climate change is already affecting the entire world, with extreme weather conditions due to burning fossil fuels like coal, oil and gas. In this context, the term “Carbon Neutralization” is proposed. The term is used in the context of carbon dioxide-releasing processes associated with transportation, energy production, agriculture, and industry. Carbon Neutralization means having a balance between emitting carbon and absorbing carbon from the atmosphere in carbon sinks. Switching energy systems from fossil fuels to renewables like solar or wind will reduce the emissions driving climate change. Carbon Neutralization is copublished by Wiley and Wenzhou University, China. Carbon Neutralization is an international journal that addresses the growing scientific interests and needs in cutting-edge energy technology involving carbon utilization and carbon emission control. It serves as a high-quality platform for researchers working in a wide variety of scientific areas to communicate their findings and critical opinions as well as bring the communities of advanced material and energy together to contribute to this emerging field. Carbon Neutralization aims at publishing environmental science, ecosystems, carbon capture and storage, renewable energy, solar energy, fuel cells, batteries, hydrogen energy, energy harvesting devices, bioenergy, biofuels, electrocatalysis, photocatalysis, and so forth. It prompts new technologies leading to the control of carbon emission and green production of carbon materials. The journal recognizes the complexity of issues, and therefore particularly welcomes innovative interdisciplinary research with wide impact. Carbon Neutralization invites you to submit original research and review articles, editorials, short communications, and letters to the editor. We encourage contributors to read the authors' guidelines (https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/page/journal/27693325/homepage/author-guidelines), grasping the criteria of each article type. Carbon Neutralization adopts an open-access publishing model, and all published articles are freely accessed through the Wiley Online Library (https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/r/carbon-neutralization). The Editorial Board of Carbon Neutralization is comprised of prominent experts around the world spanning across multiple research fields. Our Honorary Editor-in-Chief, Prof. Rose Amal, from University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia, is an ARC Laureate Fellow. She is recognized as a pioneer and leading authority in the fields of fine particle technology, photocatalysis, and functional nanomaterials having made significant contributions to these related areas of research. Our Editors-in-Chief are Prof. Shulei Chou and Prof. Min Zhao, both of them are from Wenzhou University, who are responsible for the whole publication process of Carbon Neutralization. Assisting the Editors-in-Chief to expedite the peer review process, three Associate Editors are on board, including Prof. Dawei Wang (University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia), Prof. Jianbing Li (University of Northern British Columbia, Prince George, Canada), and Prof. Hui Ying Yang (Singapore University of Technology and Design, Singapore, Singapore). Ultimately, it is our strong belief that with you as our passionate readers, resourceful authors, critical commentators, and reviewers, Carbon Neutralization will rapidly emerge into a leading open-access journal in the cross-field of clean energy and environmental science. The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it