Impacto da doença valvar nas atividades cotidianas de pacientes no período préoperatório
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Objective: to assess the impact of valvular heart disease on the daily life of patients in the preoperative period of heart surgery. Methods: we conducted a descriptive cross-sectional study using consecutive sampling. We used the assessment instrument “Impact of Valvular Heart Disease on the Daily Life of Patients”, consisting of 14 items divided into four domains: “Physical impact - symptoms”, “Impact on activities of daily living”, “Social and emotional impact” and “Adaptation to the disease”. Each domain is scored and an overall score is calculated based on the sum of all items, ranging from 14 to 350. The higher the score, the more negative the perceived impact. Results: 73 patients participated in the study. The domain that obtained the highest mean score was “Impact on activities of daily living” (82.79; SD = 21.35), followed by “Social and emotional impact” (61.24; SD = 22.7). The mean overall score was 210.55 (SD = 51.7). Conclusion: the patients rated the impact of valvular heart disease during the preoperative period of heart surgery as negative.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".