Impacto da doença valvar nas atividades cotidianas de pacientes no período préoperatório
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Objective: to assess the impact of valvular heart disease on the daily life of patients in the preoperative period of heart surgery. Methods: we conducted a descriptive cross-sectional study using consecutive sampling. We used the assessment instrument “Impact of Valvular Heart Disease on the Daily Life of Patients”, consisting of 14 items divided into four domains: “Physical impact - symptoms”, “Impact on activities of daily living”, “Social and emotional impact” and “Adaptation to the disease”. Each domain is scored and an overall score is calculated based on the sum of all items, ranging from 14 to 350. The higher the score, the more negative the perceived impact. Results: 73 patients participated in the study. The domain that obtained the highest mean score was “Impact on activities of daily living” (82.79; SD = 21.35), followed by “Social and emotional impact” (61.24; SD = 22.7). The mean overall score was 210.55 (SD = 51.7). Conclusion: the patients rated the impact of valvular heart disease during the preoperative period of heart surgery as negative.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it