Kernel k-MACE: hypercube unsupervised clustering method
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Transforming data to feature space using a kernel function can result in better expression of its features, resulting in better separability for some datasets. The parameters of the kernel function govern the structure of data in feature space and need to be optimized simultaneously while also estimating the number of clusters in a dataset. The proposed method denoted by kernel k-Minimum Average Central Error (kernel k-MACE), esti- mates the number of clusters in a dataset while simultaneously clustering the dataset in feature space by finding the optimum value of the Gaussian kernel parameter σk. A cluster initialization technique has also been proposed based on an existing method for k-means clustering. Simulations show that for self-generated datasets with Gaus- sian clusters having 10% - 50% overlap and for real benchmark datasets, the proposed method outperforms multiple state-of-the-art unsupervised clustering methods including k-MACE, the clustering scheme that inspired kernel k-MACE.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.004 | 0.021 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it