MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4285465216 · doi:10.32920/ryerson.14639265.v1

Correlation of Steady State and Transient Temperature Profiles in Perfused Fixed Kidneys: Implications for Thermal Models

2021· preprint· en· W4285465216 on OpenAlexaff
Michael C. Kolios, Michael D. Sherar, Anne Worthington, J. W. Hunt

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicMachine Learning in Materials Science
Canadian institutionsUniversity of TorontoOntario Institute for Cancer Research
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBioheat transferTransient (computer programming)Work (physics)MechanicsThermal conductivityThermodynamicsMaterials scienceHeat transferAdvectionFlow (mathematics)Blood flowSteady state (chemistry)Heat equationThermalHyperthermiaMathematicsPhysicsChemistryComputer scienceMathematical analysisCardiologyMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

1. INTRODUCTION Thermal models are used in hyperthermia to predict temperature distributions for treatment and applicator optimization. It is known that blood flow can significantly influence temperature profiles but an accurate description of this effect is unknown. Two models that have been used to model microvascular effects are the Pennes Bioheat Transfer Equation (BHTE) and the Effective Thermal Conductivity Equation (ETCE) [1], while an advection term is used in combination with the above to model large vessel effects [2]. The purpose of this work is to compare model predictions in an experimental system and to critically examine the effects of thermally significant vessels.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.278
Teacher spread0.256 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicMachine Learning in Materials ScienceFrench-language works237,207