MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4285485151 · doi:10.54056/asoi2342

2019 Economic Developer of the Year Award Winners

2020· article· en· W4285485151 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Sam Laskaris

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Aboriginal Economic Development · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicIndigenous Health, Education, and Rights
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEconomicsComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In 1995, the Cando Economic Developer of the Year Award was created to recognize and promote recent or long standing Indigenous economic development initiatives throughout Canada. Cando Economic Developer of the Year Award Winner Community Category Simpcw Resources Group Simpcw First Nation, British Columbia The Simpcw First Nation is proof that even a relatively small First Nation can achieve great things. Cando Economic Developer of the Year Award Winner Indigenous Private Sector Business Category Buck's Auto Parts Kitigan Zibi Anishinabeg First Nation, Quebec Frank Buckshot is proof a lot of hard work can take one a long way. [...]one of his businesses, Buck's Auto Parts, took top

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.007
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.009
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.970
Threshold uncertainty score0.723

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0070.009
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.001
Science and technology studies0.0060.001
Scholarly communication0.0130.003
Open science0.0020.007
Research integrity0.0060.007
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.2160.152

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.285
Teacher spread0.273 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Aboriginal Economic DevelopmentSame topicIndigenous Health, Education, and RightsFrench-language works237,207