MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4285490037 · doi:10.1117/12.2625992

MegaMapper: concept and optical design for a 6.5m aperture massively multiplexed spectroscopic facility

2022· article· en· W4285490037 on OpenAlexaff
Guillermo A. Blanc, J. Silber, Stephen A. Smee, Robert H. Barkhouser, Robert W. Besuner, Jeffrey Crane, Juna A. Kollmeier, Povilas Palunas, David J. Schlegel, Stephen A. Shectman, Ricardo Araújo, C. Baltay, Mohamed Bouri, Emily Farr, J. Guy, L. Infante, Jean‐Paul Kneib, Travis Mandeville, Claire Poppett, D. Rabinowitz, Solange Ramirez, M. Schubnell, Joshua D. Simon, Markus Thurneysen, Sarah Tuttle, William Van Shourt, Stefanie Wachter

Bibliographic record

VenueGround-based and Airborne Telescopes IX · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSemiconductor Lasers and Optical Devices
Canadian institutionsCanadian Institute for Theoretical Astrophysics
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMultiplexingMassively parallelComputer scienceAperture (computer memory)PhysicsParallel computingTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

MegaMapper is a 6.5m Magellan-like telescope fitted with a wide-field-corrector (WFC) and atmospheric-dispersion-corrector (ADC) that delivers a 3&deg; diameter corrected field-of-view. The telescope’s focal surface is populated by ∼25,000 robotic fiber-positioners feeding a cluster of 36 DESI-like medium resolution spectrographs. We present the facility concept for MegaMapper including: conceptual optical and opto-mechanical designs for the telescope and WFC/ADC that deliver ≲ 0.4” image quality over the full FOV for zenith distances ≤ 50&deg;; the development of a new and modular robotic fiber-positioner focal plane design that can populate the focal surface at high densities (6.2 mm pitch or ∼1 per arcmin<sup>2</sup>); and concepts for hosting the MegaMapper spectrograph cluster under environmentally controlled conditions inside the telescope enclosure. Building on existing and proven designs and technologies, MegaMapper aims to minimize the project’s technical risk and cost while delivering a competitive next-generation massively multiplexed spectroscopic facility. MegaMapper will lead the study of inflation, dark energy, dark matter, and time-domain astronomy over the next decades by carrying out wide-field cosmological galaxy-redshift surveys, massive spectroscopic surveys of stars in the Milky Way halo and satellites, and by providing a spectroscopic follow-up counterpart to wide field imaging facilities like the Vera C. Rubin Observatory and the <i>Nancy Grace Roman</i> space telescope.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.695
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.218
Teacher spread0.201 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGround-based and Airborne Telescopes IXSame topicSemiconductor Lasers and Optical DevicesFrench-language works237,207