MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4285497301 · doi:10.1149/ma2022-013457mtgabs

Atomic Layer Deposition of Highly Stable Manganese-Iron Oxide Bifunctional Catalysts for Zinc-Air Batteries

2022· article· en· W4285497301 on OpenAlexaff
Matthew Labbe, Ken Cadien, Douglas G. Ivey

Bibliographic record

VenueECS Meeting Abstracts · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced battery technologies research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBattery (electricity)BifunctionalEnergy storageCatalysisMaterials scienceAtomic layer depositionBifunctional catalystGrid energy storageZincNanotechnologyChemical engineeringChemistryLayer (electronics)MetallurgyEngineeringOrganic chemistryPower (physics)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Incorporating intermittent renewable energy sources into the power grid will require large amounts of grid-scale energy storage. Electrochemical batteries are a versatile and scalable energy storage option and, hence, Li-ion batteries have been widely adopted to store excess wind and solar energy [1]. Li-ion batteries, however, have a relatively low energy density and serious safety concerns. An alternative electrochemical battery option lies with zinc-air batteries. This technology uses lower cost materials and is overall much safer. Furthermore, zinc-air batteries have a much larger theoretical energy density than Li-ion batteries [2]. The major impediment to wide-scale adoption of zinc-air batteries is the low energy efficiency because of the poor reaction kinetics at the air electrode. Both the charge and discharge reactions at the air electrode are sluggish and require the use of catalysts to obtain practicable performance. However, many catalysts active towards the charge reaction are not active towards the discharge reaction, and vice versa. The development of a catalyst active towards both the charge and discharge reactions, known as a bifunctional catalyst, is therefore a high priority [3]. Furthermore, catalysts employed in zinc-air batteries often show instability, with performance degradation evident after a few cycles. Ultimately, a highly stable bifunctional zinc-air battery catalyst is of the utmost importance. The aim of this work is to develop highly stable bifunctional catalysts for zinc-air batteries using atomic layer deposition (ALD). With ALD, extremely conformal catalyst coatings can be deposited directly on the air electrode of a zinc-air battery. The self-limiting surface reactions of ALD ensure that electrode porosity is maintained while maximizing the total coating surface area [4]. Since ALD operates in the gas phase, catalytic coatings can be deposited deep within the pores of the air electrode. This will help maintain the three-phase boundary necessary for the discharge reaction and ultimately improve the stability of a zinc-air battery [5]. To create a bifunctional catalyst, two ALD processes, one for manganese oxide and another for iron oxide, is combined into one ALD supercycle, depositing a mixed manganese-iron oxide. Since manganese oxide is a well-established discharge catalyst [6], and iron oxide demonstrates activity towards the charge reaction [7], this mixed manganese-iron oxide exhibits bifunctional activity in a zinc-air battery. An optimized supercycle process will be discussed and full-cell battery test results showcased. Specifically, the bifunctional efficiency of a zinc-air battery can be improved by more than 10% by using the mixed manganese-iron oxide catalyst. In addition, the high stability of the manganese-iron oxide catalyst is demonstrated, where bifunctional efficiency can be maintained at over 95% of the initial value over 200 cycles. Materials characterization of the mixed manganese-iron oxide, deposited through ALD, is also included. [1] L. Trahey, F. R. Brushett, N. P. Balsara, G. Ceder, L. Cheng, Y. M. Chiang, N. T. Hahn, B. J. Ingram, S. D. Minteer, J. S. Moore, K. T. Mueller, L. F. Nazar, K. A. Persson, D. J. Siegel, K. Xu, K. R. Zavadil, V. Srinivasan, and G. W. Crabtree, “Energy Storage Emerging: A Perspective from the Joint Center for Energy Storage Research,” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. , vol. 117, no. 23, pp. 12550–12557, 2020. [2] J. Fu, R. Liang, G. Liu, A. Yu, Z. Bai, L. Yang, and Z. Chen, “Recent Progress in Electrically Rechargeable Zinc – Air Batteries,” Adv. Mater. , vol. 31, no. 31, p. 1805230, 2019. [3] E. Davari and D. G. Ivey, “Bifunctional electrocatalysts for Zn – air batteries,” Sustain. Energy Fuels , vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 39–67, 2018. [4] C. Detavernier, J. Dendooven, S. Pulinthanathu Sree, K. F. Ludwig, and J. A. Martens, “Tailoring nanoporous materials by atomic layer deposition,” Chem. Soc. Rev. , vol. 40, no. 11, pp. 5242–5253, 2011. [5] M. P. Clark, M. Xiong, K. Cadien, and D. G. Ivey, “High Performance Oxygen Reduction/Evolution Electrodes for Zinc − Air Batteries Prepared by Atomic Layer Deposition of MnOx,” ACS Appl. Energy Mater. , vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 603–313, 2020. [6] M. P. Clark, T. Muneshwar, M. Xiong, K. Cadien, and D. G. Ivey, “Saturation Behavior of Atomic Layer Deposition MnOx from Bis(Ethylcyclopentadienyl) Manganese and Water: Saturation Effect on Coverage of Porous Oxygen Reduction Electrodes for Metal-Air Batteries,” ACS Appl. Nano Mater. , vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 267–277, 2019. [7] M. Labbe, M. P. Clark, Z. Abedi, A. He, K. Cadien, and D. G. Ivey, “Atomic layer deposition of iron oxide on a porous carbon substrate via ethylferrocene and an oxygen plasma,” Surf. Coatings Technol. , vol. 421, p. 127390, 2021.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.446
Threshold uncertainty score0.770

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.244
Teacher spread0.228 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueECS Meeting AbstractsSame topicAdvanced battery technologies researchFrench-language works237,207