MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4285498084 · doi:10.46747/cfp.6807550

How to CRAFT an effective preceptor-learner relationship

2022· article· en· W4285498084 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Theresa van der Goes, Sudha Koppula, Cheri Bethune

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Family Physician · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicInnovations in Medical Education
Canadian institutionsUniversity of AlbertaMemorial University of NewfoundlandUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPreceptorFormative assessmentCraftMedical educationComputer scienceFocus (optics)Outcome (game theory)MedicinePsychologyMathematics education

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

With the advent of postgraduate competency-based medical education (CBME), the preceptor-learner relationship is in the spotlight. The focus on defined outcomes (outcome targets), learner-centric delivery, and direct observation, with an emphasis on formative assessment,[1][1] has demanded a

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.040
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.088
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.040
Threshold uncertainty score0.212

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0400.088
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0100.005
Scholarly communication0.0130.016
Open science0.0030.014
Research integrity0.0080.013
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0270.017

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.279
Teacher spread0.260 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2022
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Family PhysicianSame topicInnovations in Medical EducationFrench-language works237,207