Co-Designing an OpenMP GPU Runtime and Optimizations for Near-Zero Overhead Execution
Bibliographic record
Abstract
GPU accelerators are ubiquitous in modern HPC systems. To program them, users have the choice between vendor-specific, native programming models, such as CUDA, which provide simple parallelism semantics with minimal runtime support, or portable alternatives, such as OpenMP, which offer rich parallel semantics and feature an extensive runtime library to support execution. While the operations of such a runtime can easily limit performance and drain resources, it was to some degree regarded an unavoidable overhead. In this work we present a co-design methodology for optimizing applications using a specifically crafted OpenMP GPU runtime such that most use cases induce near-zero overhead. Specifically, our approach exposes runtime semantics and state to the compiler such that optimization effectively eliminating abstractions and runtime state from the final binary. With the help of user provided assumptions we can further optimize common patterns that otherwise increase resource consumption. We evaluated our prototype build on top of the LLVM/OpenMP GPU offloading infrastructure with multiple HPC proxy applications and benchmarks. Comparison of CUDA, the original OpenMP runtime, and our co-designed alternative show that, by our approach, performance is significantly improved and resource consumption is significantly lowered. Oftentimes we can closely match the CUDA implementation without sacrificing the versatility and portability of OpenMP.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".