Jointly Low-Rank Tensor Completion for Estimating Missing Spatiotemporal Values in Logistics Systems
Bibliographic record
Abstract
With the deepening of industry 4.0 paradigm in logistics systems, artificial intelligent has been widely used to improve the quality of logistics services. Considering that data collected in comprehensive logistics service system usually integrate multistage complex information such as traffic flow records and spatiotemporal trajectory, it is inevitable that the data are incomplete and partially missing due to equipment failures, communication interruptions, etc. As an effective spatiotemporal completion tool in logistics systems, low-rank tensor completion has aroused extensive research interest thanks to its excellent performance on data recovery. Although existing tensor completion methods effectively capture the complex associations/dependencies of multidimensional inputs, they fail to exploit the potential characteristics of spatiotemporal data, such as the periodicity. In this article, we propose a jointly low-rank tensor completion method for logistics data completion, which constructs multiple periodic subtensors by setting an appropriate time window, then performs jointly low-rank completion and imputation. In addition, we also provide an optimization algorithm based on Alternating Direction Method of Multiplier framework for the proposed problem. Experimental results on four logistics-related datasets have further demonstrated the promising performance of the proposed method compared with other state-of-the-art competitors. We believe that the proposed approach not only effectively maintains the advantages of classical completion methods, but also fully excavates the multidimensional correlation and hidden patterns behind records, and further provides a novel and effective strategy for data completion and imputation in logistics systems.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.009 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".