MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4285528091 · doi:10.12943/cnr.2020.00003

FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS OF AN EMPTY 37-ELEMENT CANDU<sup>®</sup> FUEL BUNDLE TO STUDY THE EFFECTS OF PRESSURE TUBE CREEP

2021· article· en· W4285528091 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Kyu Hwan Lee, Diane Wowk, Paul K. Chan

Bibliographic record

VenueCNL Nuclear Review · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicNuclear and radioactivity studies
Canadian institutionsRoyal Military College of Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBundleMaterials scienceDeformation (meteorology)Finite element methodBowingCreepTube (container)CoolantInternal pressureStructural engineeringMechanicsComposite materialMechanical engineeringEngineeringPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

CANDU fuel bundles experience plastic deformations over time, and the horizontal configuration of the bundle in a crept pressure tube (PT) causes coolant to bypass the sagged lower half of the bundle. Bundle segments where the flow is limited may become more susceptible to dryout due to reactor aging. A finite element model of a 37-element fuel bundle was constructed using the commercial finite element software ANSYS to study the mechanical deformation behaviour of the bundle to maintain a coolable geometry. The main focus was on the contact between the fuel elements and between the fuel elements and PT. The complexity of the model due to all the contact pairs necessitated the use of high-powered computing hardware. Contact was demonstrated between the appendages, and sensitivity of the deformation to different boundary conditions (BC) was investigated. In particular, the radial position where the elements were welded to the endplate significantly impacted the magnitude of the element bowing. Expanding the PT up to 8% diametral creep demonstrated the proper functioning of the spacer pads (SP) and bearing pads in preventing sheath-to-sheath contact at the midplane and sheath-to-PT contact. However, the quarter plane was deemed to be the critical region due to the lack of SPs preventing excessive element bowing. This work has successfully illustrated the deformation of a CANDU fuel bundle, with contact, and its similarity with the bow profiles when compared with post-irradiation examination results and bundle heat-up tests.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.739
Threshold uncertainty score0.646

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.259
Teacher spread0.246 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2021
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCNL Nuclear ReviewSame topicNuclear and radioactivity studiesFrench-language works237,207