MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4285535063 · doi:10.17721/2518-1270.2021.63.11

The Situation of the Peasantry in the Kyiv Province in the Post-reform Agricultural Relations at the End of the XIX Century According to the Publications of Kyiv Newspapers about Uman District

2021· article· en· W4285535063 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueEthnic History of European Nations · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicGlobal Economic and Social Development
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPeasantNewspaperPopulationAgrarian societyQuarter (Canadian coin)Political scienceEconomic historyAgricultureEconomyLawSociologyGeographyEconomicsDemography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The article, based on the publications of Kyiv newspapers about the Uman district of the Kyiv province, highlights the situation of the peasantry in the last quarter of the XIX ‒ early XX centuries. The provincial Press wrote that a few decades after the agrarian reform of 1861, the land issue worsened, which led to further impoverishment of the majority of the peasantry. Having received personal freedom and the right to buy land, the vast majority of rural workers suffered from lack of land and could not use the services of a peasant bank to buy land. The Press published materials about the complicated system of peasant earnings, insidious traps of conditions for hiring peasants to perform field work in the farms of landlords, which were prepared by economists and tenants to attract cheap workers and enslave the peasants. Reports were also published that despite the ban on physical punishment of rural workers, landlords arranged lynching and punished for economic offenses. In the provincial press, publications were also found that a fairly small part of the peasantry took advantage of the opportunity and bought the land. The most important reasons for this were the lack of funds among the vast majority of peasants and the unwillingness of landlords to sell land, for which the owners resorted to raising the price of land plots. The pages of Kyiv newspapers reflect the public outcry regarding the situation of a fairly large category of the population ‒ quit-rent peasants. The capitalization of land and the legal uncertainty in the Imperial legislation of their state, which was based on customary law, made this category of the population particularly dependent on the will of landowners. A government attempt to legally resolve this issue in 1886 was unsuccessful, as it was delayed for a long time. The intentions of the authorities and the hopes of landless peasants to partially solve the problem of «land famine» by resettling landless and low-land peasants also turned out to be illusory. Thus, the article, based on publications in the provincial press about the events in the Uman district, shows that the situation of the peasantry in the late XIX ‒ early XX centuries remained difficult.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.836
Threshold uncertainty score0.640

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.212
Teacher spread0.185 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it