MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4285541109 · doi:10.36576/summa.146835

LA RECIPROCIDAD ENTRE FE Y MATRIMONIO. COMENTARIO DE CUESTIONES MATRIMONIALES CANÓNICAS EN EL DOCUMENTO LA RECIPROCIDAD ENTRE FE Y SACRAMENTOS EN LA ECONOMÍA SACRAMENTAL DE LA COMISIÓN TEOLÓGICA INTERNACIONAL (2019)

2022· article· es· W4285541109 on OpenAlexaff
Raúl Román Sánchez

Bibliographic record

VenueRevista Española de Derecho Canónico · 2022
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicTheology and Canon Law Studies
Canadian institutionsRed Deer Polytechnic
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPolitical sciencePhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Se realiza la exposición y comentario del Documento del año 2019 La reciprocidad entre fe y sacramentos en la economía sacramental elaborado por la Comisión Teológica Internacional. Se centra la atención en los enunciados referidos al Sacramento del matrimonio, destacando cómo se exponen y desarrollan las cuestiones más fundamentales en el ámbito del Derecho matrimonial canónico como son la sacramentalidad del matrimonio, el matrimonio entre "bautizados no creyentes" y la inseparabilidad entre contrato y sacramento.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.893
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0020.000
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.269
Teacher spread0.263 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRevista Española de Derecho CanónicoSame topicTheology and Canon Law StudiesFrench-language works237,207