Combiner expertise, expérimentation et simulation pour une gestion durable des adventices : les plateformes prospectives Syppre.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The Syppre action (ARVALIS, ITB, Terres Inovia) aims to support the development of innovative cropping systems that meet a triple performance objective: economic, environmental and social. For the "experimentation" component of the action, several ex ante evaluations of cropping systems have been carried out, using tools adapted to each stage. Within the framework of the ANR CoSAC, a new evaluation method has been developed based on the DEXiPM® model, to support the development of the systems being tested. Links have been created between this model from the Pure project and the SYSTERRE® and FLORSYS tools for weed indicators. The article shows the interest of mobilizing ex ante evaluation in experimentation for a multi-criteria vision of the cropping systems studied. It highlights the interest of cross-referencing several tools and models whose choice depends on the degree of maturity of the trials and the sustainability criteria to be reinforced.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".