MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4285585812 · doi:10.1117/12.2626242

Nancy Grace Roman Space Telescope coronagraph EMCCD flight camera electronics development

2022· article· en· W4285585812 on OpenAlexaff
Olivier Daigle, James Veilleux, Frédéric Grandmont, Patrick Morrissey, Christophe Basset, Nathan Bush, Michael E. Hoenk, A. Gilbert, Jérémy Turcotte, Abtin Ghodoussi

Bibliographic record

VenueSpace Telescopes and Instrumentation 2022: Optical, Infrared, and Millimeter Wave · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAstronomical Observations and Instrumentation
Canadian institutionsABB (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCoronagraphTelescopeSpitzer Space TelescopeDevelopment (topology)PhysicsSpace (punctuation)OpticsElectronicsAstronomyRemote sensingComputer scienceEngineeringElectrical engineeringGeologyStars

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Nancy Grace Roman Space Telescope Coronagraph is a JPL-led space-based instrument that will be the most sensitive instrument ever built for direct imaging and characterization of exoplanets in the visible. The instrument contrast is expected to be better than 1e-9, which implies that it will be capable of seeing exoplanets with an apparent magnitude < 30. With such a low brightness, only a few photons per hour will be perceived by its optical detectors. Two cameras will be used on the instrument for wavefront sensing, direct imaging and spectroscopy, with frame rates ranging from 1000 fps to less than 0.01 fps. For such a broad range of operating modes and industry leading noise figure, JPL has selected the 1024x1024 CCD201- 20 EMCCD from Teledyne-e2v as the image sensor for the two coronagraph cameras and appealed to Nüvü Caméras to adapt its most recent space controller design for the mission specifics. The new version of the camera readout electronics co-developed with ABB Space System group brings important improvements over the version flown at the edge of space in CSA’s 2018 STRATOS campaign namely on reliability, functionality, thermal control, power, volume and mass whilst preserving its unique noise performance. This paper presents an overview of the project and addresses the development of the delivered flight modules.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.019
Threshold uncertainty score0.065

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0190.014

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.196
Teacher spread0.188 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSpace Telescopes and Instrumentation 2022: Optical, Infrared, and Millimeter WaveSame topicAstronomical Observations and InstrumentationFrench-language works237,207