Bibliographic record
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The purpose of this review is to summarize and highlight the recent literature in photodermatoses. In the past year, there have been many developments in this heterogeneous group of conditions. RECENT FINDINGS: This review is divided by photodermatoses type, which include idiopathic photodermatoses, photodermatoses secondary to exogenous agents, photodermatoses secondary to endogenous agents (the porphyrias), and genodermatoses. The idiopathic photodermatoses section focuses on case series and reports highlighting new disease presentations or further disease characterization and new treatment strategies for these disorders. The second section discusses a unique case and has a brief update on photoallergens. Clinical, diagnostic, and treatment updates for porphyrias are discussed in Section 3. For genodermatoses, we discuss complications and neoplastic risk of xeroderma pigmentosum and a few highlights from other rare disorders. Finally, we conclude with a brief overview of photoprotection updates, from assessing sun-damaged skin to the most effective photoprotective agents. SUMMARY: Up-to-date information will help providers identify and manage this rare group of disorders.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".