MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4285589669 · doi:10.1111/dom.14817

<scp>TOTUM</scp> ‐63, a plant‐based polyphenol‐rich extract, improves glycaemic control in subjects with prediabetes or early stage newly‐diagnosed type 2 diabetes in a randomized, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled trial

2022· article· en· W4285589669 on OpenAlexaff
Pascal Sirvent, Vivien Chavanelle, Yolanda F. Otero, Maxime Bargetto, Florian Le Joubioux, Nathalie Boisseau, Thierry Maugard, Murielle Cazaubiel, Bruno Guigas, Samy Hadjadj, Sébastien Peltier, André Marette, Jean‐Marie Bard

Bibliographic record

VenueDiabetes Obesity and Metabolism · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPhytochemicals and Antioxidant Activities
Canadian institutionsUniversité Laval
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicinePrediabetesPostprandialPlaceboGlycemicInternal medicineOverweightTolerabilityType 2 diabetesBody mass indexWaistGastroenterologyDiabetes mellitusRandomized controlled trialEndocrinologyInsulinAdverse effect

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

AIM: The plant-based polyphenol-rich extract TOTUM-63 improves glucose homeostasis in various preclinical models of obesity and type 2 diabetes (T2D). A pilot exploratory study showed that TOTUM-63 has good safety and tolerability profiles, and beneficial effects on postprandial glucose control in healthy individuals with overweight. The aim of this study was to assess the effects of TOTUM-63 on glycaemic control in individuals with prediabetes or early stage newly-diagnosed T2D (which does not require pharmacological treatment). MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study was a multicentre, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Individuals with prediabetes or early stage newly-diagnosed T2D and with overweight/abdominal obesity received TOTUM-63 (5 g/day) or placebo for 6 months. The primary outcome was the change in fasting blood glucose. RESULTS: ; 35 women and 16 men) completed the study (n = 38 TOTUM-63, n = 13 placebo). After 6 months, blood glucose concentration after fasting and after the 2-h oral glucose tolerance test was reduced in the TOTUM-63-treated group compared with the placebo group (placebo-corrected difference between baseline and month 6: -0.71 mmol/L, p < .05, and -1.93 mmol/L, p < .05, respectively). TOTUM-63 was safe and well tolerated and significantly reduced body weight gain (-1.9 kg; p < .05), waist circumference (-4.5 cm; p < .001), circulating triglycerides (-0.54 mmol/L; p < .01) and low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (-0.38 mmol/L; p < .05) compared with placebo. CONCLUSIONS: TOTUM-63 lowered fasting blood glucose in participants with impaired fasting glycaemia and glucose intolerance. Moreover, TOTUM-63 showed a good safety and tolerability profile and improved several metabolic syndrome features. Therefore, TOTUM-63 is a promising candidate for T2D prevention.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Randomized trial · Consensus signal: Randomized trial
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.014

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.232
Teacher spread0.220 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designRandomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations12
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDiabetes Obesity and MetabolismSame topicPhytochemicals and Antioxidant ActivitiesFrench-language works237,207