MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4285590049 · doi:10.5194/hess-2022-51-rc2

Comment on hess-2022-51

2022· peer-review· en· W4285590049 on OpenAlexafffund

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typepeer-review
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicCryospheric studies and observations
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
FundersGlobal Water FuturesUniversity of BristolLeverhulme Trust
KeywordsSnowEnvironmental scienceStreamflowPercentileDrainage basinRange (aeronautics)Hydrology (agriculture)Snow coverClimatologyGlacierMeteorologyPhysical geographyStatisticsGeologyGeographyCartographyMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper we implement a degree day snow and glacier melt model into the Dynamic fluxEs and ConnectIvity for Predictions of HydRology (DECIPHeR) model. The purpose is to develop a hydrological model that can be applied to large glaciated and snow-fed catchments, yet is computationally efficient enough to include model uncertainty in streamflow predictions. The model is evaluated by simulating monthly discharge at six gauging stations in the Naryn River catchment (57,833 km2) in Central Asia over the period 1951 to a variable end date between 1980 and 1995 depending on the availability of discharge observations. The spatial distribution of simulated snow cover is validated against MODIS weekly snow extent for the years 2001–2007. Discharge is calibrated by selecting parameter sets using Latin Hypercube sampling and assessing the model performance using six evaluation metrics. The model shows good performance at simulating monthly discharge for the evaluation period (NSE is 0.74 < NSE < 0.87) and validation period (0.7 < NSE < 0.9) where the range of NSE values represent the 5th–95th percentile prediction limits across the gauging stations. The exception is the Uch-Kurgan station which exhibits a reduction in model performance during the validation period attributed to commissioning of the Toktugal reservoir in 1975 which impacted the observations. The model reproduces the spatial extent in seasonal snow cover well, capturing 86 % of the snow extent on average (2001–2007) for the median ensemble member of the best 0.5 % evaluation simulations, when evaluated against MODIS snow extent. We establish the present-day contributions of glacier melt, snow melt and rainfall to the total annual discharge and the timing of when these components dominate river flow. The model predicts the observed increase in discharge during the spring (April–May) associated with the onset of snow melting and peak discharge during the summer (June, July and August) associated with glacier melting well. At all stations snow melting is the largest component, followed by the rainfall and the glacier melt component. In August, glacier melting can contribute up to 66 % of the total discharge at the highly glacierised Naryn headwater sub-catchment. The glaciated area predicted by the best 0.5 % evaluation simulations overlap the Landsat observations for the late 1990s and mid-2000s. Despite good predictions for discharge, the model produces a large range of estimates for the glaciated area (680 km2–1,196 km2) (5th–95th percentile limits) at the end of the simulation period. To constrain these estimates further, additional observations such as glacier mass balance, snow depth or snow extent should be used directly to constrain model simulations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.010
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Commentary · Consensus signal: Commentary
Teacher disagreement score0.066
Threshold uncertainty score0.220

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.010
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0040.003
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0100.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0660.039

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.058
GPT teacher head0.275
Teacher spread0.217 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreCommentary

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicCryospheric studies and observations→French-language works237,207→