Generalised idiopathic polymyositis mimicking masticatory myositis in a dog
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Masticatory myositis (MM) and generalised idiopathic polymyositis (gIPM) are the most common immune‐mediated myositis in dogs. In humans, the diagnosis and classification of myositis have continuously evolved over the past few decades with the combination of histopathological and immunohistochemical evaluation alongside the identification of myositis‐specific autoantibodies (MSAs). In dogs, however, MSAs have only been described in MM and breeds such as Newfoundland and Boxer. We report a case of a dog that presented with sub‐acute pain when chewing and exophthalmos, followed by chronic progressive masticatory muscle atrophy and enophthalmos. Clinical signs and electromyography were primarily consistent with MM, but serological autoantibodies against type 2M myofibres were negative. Creatine kinase activity, histological and immunohistochemical examination of the temporal and triceps brachii muscles and negative infectious disease tests were consistent with gIPM. This atypical case highlights the requirement for multiple muscle biopsies and appeals for extended immunohistochemical studies in canine myositis.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it