Paediatric <scp><i>BCOR</i></scp>‐associated sarcomas with a novel long spliced internal tandem duplication of <scp><i>BCOR</i></scp> exon 15
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Clear cell sarcoma of the kidney (CCSK) and primitive myxoid mesenchymal tumour of infancy (PMMTI) are paediatric sarcomas that most commonly harbour internal tandem duplications (ITDs) of exon 15 of the BCOR gene, in the range of 87-114 base pairs (bp). Some cases, instead, have BCOR-CCNB3 or YWHAE-NUTM2 gene fusions. About 10% of cases lack any of these genetic alterations when tested by standard methods. Two cases of CCSK and one PMMTI lacking the aforementioned mutations were analysed using Archer FusionPlex technology. Two related BCOR exon 15 RNA transcripts with ITDs of lengths 388 and 96 bp were detected in each case; only the 388 bp transcript was identified when genomic DNA was sequenced. In silico analysis of this transcript revealed acceptor and donor splice sites indicating that, at the RNA level, the 388-bp transcript was likely spliced to form the 96-bp transcript. The results were confirmed by Sanger sequencing using primers targeting the ITD breakpoint. This novel and unusually long ITD segment is difficult to identify by DNA sequencing using typical primer design strategies flanking entire duplicated segments because it exceeds the typical read lengths of most sequencing platforms as well as the usual fragment lengths obtained from formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded material. As diagnosis of CCSK and PMMTI may be challenging by morphology and immunohistochemistry alone, it is important to identify mutations in these cases. Knowledge of this novel BCOR ITD is important in relation to primer design for detection by sequencing, and using RNA versus DNA for sequencing.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".