MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

The Mi’kmaq, the Pattersons and Remembering the Scottish Colonisation of Nova Scotia

2020· book-chapter· en· W4285656098 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Michael E. Vance

Bibliographic record

VenueEdinburgh University Press eBooks · 2020
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCanadian Identity and History
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIndigenousNova scotiaGeorge (robot)HistoryRepresentation (politics)TreatyScholarshipGenealogyLawArt historyPolitical scienceEthnologyPolitics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Starting with a photograph showing a group of approximately 40 Mi’kmaw men, women and children taken at the 1923 <italic>Hector</italic> celebration in Pictou, Nova Scotia, the role that the celebration of the Scottish pioneers served in erasing awareness of the presence of indigenous peoples prior to the emigrant ship’s arrival in 1773 is explored in this chapter. The significance of the Mi’kmaw leaders pictured in the photograph and their role in asserting indigenous treaty rights is discussed before examining the representation of Mi’kmaq/settler relations in the scholarship of Rev. George Patterson. The chapter argues that his son, Judge George G. Patterson, ignored this early history and was responsible for branding the <italic>Hector</italic> as Canada’s <italic>Mayflower</italic>- this representation led Judge Patterson to deny Mi’kmaq treaty rights altogether.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.651
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.205
Teacher spread0.178 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEdinburgh University Press eBooksSame topicCanadian Identity and HistoryFrench-language works237,207