MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4285718787 · doi:10.4000/books.pupo.18930

Un même autre, un autre même. Maurice Blanchot et Walter Benjamin

2020· book-chapter· fr· W4285718787 on OpenAlexaff
Vivian Liska

Bibliographic record

VenuePresses universitaires de Paris Nanterre eBooks · 2020
Typebook-chapter
Languagefr
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicWalter Benjamin Studies Compilation
Canadian institutionsCentre Intégré de Santé et de Services Sociaux des Laurentides
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Bien que Walter Benjamin et Maurice Blanchot fussent tous les deux parmi les théoriciens et critiques littéraires les plus importants du dernier siècle – ceux qui accordaient à la littérature le rôle le plus radical et décisif pour la pensée – leur rapprochement n’est point évident et a rarement été envisagé. Quel rapport entre le penseur juif-allemand qui, persécuté par les Nazis, se suicida en 1940 et dont l’œuvre, qui s’étend de ses premiers écrits fortement imprégnés de théologie à son ad...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.040
Threshold uncertainty score0.133

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0050.008
Scholarly communication0.0100.009
Open science0.0010.004
Research integrity0.0050.006
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0400.010

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.218
Teacher spread0.192 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePresses universitaires de Paris Nanterre eBooksSame topicWalter Benjamin Studies CompilationFrench-language works237,207