L’importance des peuples autochtones et afro-descendants dans la construction de la notion de communauté en droit colombien
Bibliographic record
Abstract
La diversité culturelle est un trait caractéristique de la Colombie. Sa consécration expresse dans la Constitution de 1991 a été un pas décisif vers la reconnaissance des peuples autochtones et afro-descendants en tant que communautés méritant une protection spéciale, ce qui n’est pas anodin. En effet, c’est grâce à cette reconnaissance qu’aujourd’hui il est acquis que ces communautés sont des sujets collectifs titulaires de droits fondamentaux. La Cour constitutionnelle colombienne a, en outre, pris soin de préciser que ces droits fondamentaux ne sont pas équivalents aux droits individuels dont bénéficie chacun de leurs membres et a insisté sur le fait que de tels droits ne sont pas assimilables aux droits collectifs d’autres groupes humains. Ce traitement spécifique accordé aux autochtones et afro-descendants constitue le point de départ d’une réflexion approfondie portant sur les critères essentiels permettant de caractériser une communauté ainsi que les implications de lui reconnaître le statut de sujet de droit particulier.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.019 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".