Correlating Structures to Electrochemiluminescence Efficiencies of Silole Compounds in Coreactant Systems
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract To develop efficient electrochemiluminescence (ECL) of activated silole chromophores, the relative ECL efficiencies of eight thiophene‐containing compounds are firstly studied in a coreactant pathway. The experimental results show that the extended π‐conjugated systems and donor groups of the silole emitters affect both the radical stability and emission efficiencies. It is found that the 1,1‐di‐tert‐butyl‐2,5‐bis[(2,2′‐bithiophen)‐5‐yl]‐3,4‐diphenylsilole (2c) compound with benzoyl peroxide (BPO) as a coreactant exhibits the highest relative ECL efficiencies among the studied systems due to its structural properties. Moreover, the absolute ECL efficiency of the potential pulsing/ECL experiment in the coreactant pathway is 6‐fold larger than that in the potentiodynamic experiment due to the short time interval for the radical species to meet and react. This work provides a guidance for structural modification of silole compounds to tune ECL performance.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".