Chemotherapy-induced functional brain abnormality in colorectal cancer patients: a resting‐state functional magnetic resonance imaging study
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Introduction: Chemotherapy-induced cognitive impairment (i.e., "chemobrain") is a common neurotoxic side-effect experienced by many cancer survivors who undergone chemotherapy. However, the central mechanism underlying chemotherapy-related cognitive impairment is still unclear. The purpose of this study was to investigate the changes of intrinsic brain activity and their associations with cognitive impairment in colorectal cancer (CRC) patients after chemotherapy. Methods: Resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging data of 29 CRC patients following chemotherapy and 29 matched healthy controls (HCs) were collected in this study, as well as cognitive test data including Mini Mental State Exam (MMSE), Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) and Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Cognitive Function (FACT-Cog). The measure of fractional amplitude of low-frequency fluctuation (fALFF) was calculated and compared between groups. The correlations between the fALFF of impaired brain region and cognitive performance were also analyzed. Results: Compared with HCs, CRC patients following chemotherapy showed decreased fALFF values in the left anterior cingulate gyrus (ACG) and middle frontal gyrus, as well as increased fALFF values in the left superior frontal gyrus (orbital part) and middle occipital gyrus. Moreover, positive associations were identified between fALFF values of the left ACG and the total scores of MMSE, MoCA and FACT-Cog in the patient group. Conclusion: These findings indicated that CRC patients after chemotherapy had decreased intrinsic brain activity in the left ACG, which might be vulnerable to the neurotoxic side-effect of chemotherapeutic drugs and related to chemotherapy-induced cognitive impairment.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".