MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4285729116 · doi:10.3390/machines10070582

Thruster Fault Diagnostics and Fault Tolerant Control for Autonomous Underwater Vehicle with Ocean Currents

2022· article· en· W4285729116 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueMachines · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicFault Detection and Control Systems
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersChina Postdoctoral Science Foundation
KeywordsFault (geology)UnderwaterParticle swarm optimizationFuzzy logicController (irrigation)Control theory (sociology)Control engineeringFault toleranceNoise (video)Computer scienceEngineeringControl (management)Artificial intelligenceAlgorithmReliability engineeringGeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Autonomous underwater vehicle (AUV) is one of the most important exploration tools in the ocean underwater environment, whose movement is realized by the underwater thrusters, however, the thruster fault happens frequently in engineering practice. Ocean currents perturbations could produce noise for thruster fault diagnosis, in order to solve the thruster fault diagnostics, a possibilistic fuzzy C-means (PFCM) algorithm is proposed to realize the fault classification in this paper. On the basis of the results of fault diagnostics, a fuzzy control strategy is proposed to solve the fault tolerant control for AUV. Considering the uncertainty of ocean currents, it proposes a min-max robust optimization problem to optimize the fuzzy controller, which is solved by a cooperative particle swarm optimization (CPSO) algorithm. Simulation and underwater experiments are used to verify the accuracy and feasibility of the proposed method of thruster fault diagnostics and fault tolerant control.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.072
Threshold uncertainty score0.527

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.207
Teacher spread0.201 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it