MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4285733962 · doi:10.15690/vsp.v21i3.2430

Pediatricians’ Competence in Prevention, Risk Determination or Detection of Suicidal Behavior in Children: Cross-Sectional Survey Study

2022· article· en· W4285733962 on OpenAlex
Anna Y. Basova, М А Бебчук, Natalia V. Ustinova, Leyla S. Namazova-Baranova, Kamilla E. Efendiyeva, Еlena A. Vishneva

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueВопросы современной педиатрии · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicSuicide and Self-Harm Studies
Canadian institutionsChildren’s Health Research Institute
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCompetence (human resources)Cross-sectional studyMedicineMoodNoticeSuicide preventionFamily medicinePsychiatryInjury preventionPopulationComputer-assisted web interviewingPoison controlClinical psychologyPsychologyMedical emergency

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background. Child and adolescent suicides remain one of the most painful public issues. The COVID-19 pandemic has aggravated this topic as the number of suicides among children population has increased in this period. Research and practice guidelines identify the leading role of primary care physicians in the prevention, identification, and routing of patients with suicidal behavior. At the same time, there were no studies on pediatricians’ competence in the field of suicides. Objective. The aim of the study is to study pediatricians’ competence in prevention, risk determination or and detection of suicidal behavior. Methods. Cross-sectional study was conducted with the usage of original electronic questionnaire aimed on identifying the level of pediatricians’ competence in evaluating suicidal behavior in children. Questionnaire included 18 questions. Results . We have received 208 electronic questionnaires. 97.1% of specialists have confirmed that they evaluate emotional status of their patients during admission. During admission: 86.1% of specialists have considered the characteristics of children appearance, facial expression, voice intonation, 65.4% — have asked questions about mood, 62.5% — have interviewed parents. 98.6% of specialists pay attention to the presence of self-inflicted injuries marks, 88.4% — ask about the origin of these injuries. Only 36.1% of respondents ask patients about suicidal thoughts, intentions, or actions. Only 69.3% of specialists are ready to refer their patients to psychologist, and 51.7% — to psychiatrist. Conclusion. Even though most surveyed pediatricians notice signs of suicidal intent (low mood, self-inflicted injuries), they avoid discussing the topic of suicide during admission. Increasing the competence of pediatricians should be aimed on destigmatisation in the field of mental health, increasing the knowledge level, and developing practical skills in working with children with suicidal behavior.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.013
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.049
GPT teacher head0.369
Teacher spread0.321 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it