MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4285751055 · doi:10.31857/s268667300012341-5

The State and Science in the Trump Era: Preliminary Results

2020· article· en· W4285751055 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueUSA & Canada Economics – Politics – Culture · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicInternational Science and Diplomacy
Canadian institutionsInstitute for Christian Studies
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeneral partnershipPolitical scienceState (computer science)Administration (probate law)Position (finance)Public administrationSpace (punctuation)Public relationsTelecommunicationsBusinessEngineeringComputer scienceLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The global trends of recent decades show new challenges to the position of the United States as a leader in the field of science and innovation. The response measures taken by the Trump administration and Congress are aimed at the further development of the U.S. science and technology capabilities with a focus on modern "breakthrough" technologies (artificial intelligence, quantum information science, biotechnology, 5G telecommunications networks, space exploration) as well as on expanding public-private partnership. While the White House continues to insist on cutting federal spending on nondefense R&D to spur defense developments, Congress is making decisions based primarily on research agencies’ budget requests, taking into account new initiatives and program changes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.896
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.273
Teacher spread0.257 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it