MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4285782053 · doi:10.21203/rs.2.13667/v2

Profiling of inflammatory mediators in the synovial fluid related to pain in knee osteoarthritis

2019· preprint· en· W4285782053 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Li Li, Zhenxing Li, Yuyan Li, Xi Hu, Yu Zhang, Pei Fan

Bibliographic record

VenueResearch Square · 2019
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicOsteoarthritis Treatment and Mechanisms
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersWenzhou Municipal Science and Technology BureauNatural Science Foundation of Zhejiang ProvinceNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsOsteoarthritisSynovial fluidProfiling (computer programming)MedicineKnee painPhysical therapyPathologyComputer scienceAlternative medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background: Inflammatory mediators in the synovial fluid (SF) play critical roles in the initiation and development of pain in knee osteoarthritis (KOA). However, the expression of inflammatory mediators is controversial and the role of SF inflammatory mediators in neuropathic pain is not clear. Therefore, the aim of this study is to identify the SF inflammatory mediators associated with nociceptive and neuropathic pain in KOA. Methods: The levels of IL-1β, IL-6, TNF-α, macrophage colony-stimulating factor, MMP-3, MMP-13, metalloproteinase with thrombospondin motifs 5, calcitonin gene-related peptide, neuropeptide Y, substance P and bradykinin were measured in 86 patients using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays. Nociceptive pain was measured using the numeric rating scale (NRS), visual analog scale (VAS) and Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC ) pain score. Neuropathic pain was measured using the PainDETECT questionnaire. Moreover, knee function was evaluated by the WOMAC score and range of motion (ROM) assessments. Radiological grade was defined using the Kellgren-Lawrence (K-L) grading scale. Results: Pain scores measured using different methods were highly correlated to each other. The worse the pain, the worse the K-L grade and knee function were. The expression of IL-1β and IL-6 was increased in the early stage compared with the late stage. The NRS was positively correlated to age, K-L grade, and the WOMAC score and negatively correlated to ROM and TNF-α expression. The VAS was positively correlated to age, K-L grade, and the WOMAC score but negatively correlated to ROM and the levels of IL-1β, IL-6 and TNF-α. The WOMAC pain score was not correlated to any of the measured inflammatory mediators; it correlated to only ROM. The PainDETECT score correlated to only the WOMAC score. The expression of other inflammatory mediators was not correlated to any of the pain scores. Conclusions: IL-1β, IL-6 and TNF-α exhibit higher expression in early stage of KOA than the late stage of KOA and correlated to pain. The measured catabolic enzymes and neuropeptides are not correlated to nociceptive and neuropathic pain. New biomarkers related to pain in the late stage need to be further investigated.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.337
Teacher spread0.312 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueResearch Square→Same topicOsteoarthritis Treatment and Mechanisms→French-language works237,207→