MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

The RADECS 2019 Technical Program Committee

2019· article· en· W4285789079 on OpenAlexfundno aff

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicDistributed and Parallel Computing Systems
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersLawrence Berkeley National LaboratorySandia National LaboratoriesAirbus Defense and SpaceJapan Aerospace Exploration AgencyLomonosov Moscow State UniversityNorthwest Institute of Nuclear TechnologyNational Research Nuclear University MEPhIHarbin Institute of TechnologyUniversidade Federal de Santa CatarinaUniversidad de AlicanteAgence Nationale pour la Gestion des Déchets RadioactifsUniversidade Federal do Rio Grande do SulMassachusetts General HospitalOffice National d'études et de Recherches AérospatialesLos Alamos National LaboratoryGoddard Space Flight CenterUniversità degli Studi di PadovaJet Propulsion LaboratoryInnovation, Science and Economic Development CanadaCentre National d’Etudes SpatialesVanderbilt UniversityOffice of Naval ResearchUniversidad de SevillaCERNTU Graz, Internationale Beziehungen und MobilitätsprogrammeUniversità degli Studi di Napoli Federico IIAalto-YliopistoNational Aeronautics and Space Administration
KeywordsComputer scienceProgramming languageSoftware engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex
No abstract in any covered source. Its absence is recorded, not treated as a negative.

No abstract. This is not a gap in this database; OpenAlex has none either. 23.3% of the frame is in this state, and the screen finds HALF as much metaresearch here, so the absence is a measured bias rather than a missing field.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.014
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.009
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.163
Threshold uncertainty score0.544

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0140.009
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.002
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0080.003
Open science0.0020.003
Research integrity0.0040.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1630.202

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.249
Teacher spread0.241 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same topicDistributed and Parallel Computing SystemsFrench-language works237,207