MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4285799944 · doi:10.5539/ijef.v14n8p23

The Impacts of Fiscal and Macroeconomic Factors on Vietnam Government Bond Yield

2022· article· en· W4285799944 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Hoang Le Trang Nguyen, Phuong Anh Nguyen

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Economics and Finance · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicMonetary Policy and Economic Impact
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGovernment bondBondEconomicsPublic financeMonetary economicsYield (engineering)Government (linguistics)Government revenueFinanceMacroeconomics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Government bond yield refers to the borrowing cost for government and the expected return for the individual and institutional investors. Having knowledge of government bond yield helps government operate or adjust the government bond issuance to boost the economic conditions in a country and support investors when diversifying their investment portfolio. To contribute to government bond’s literature and government’s policy, the determinants of government bond yield in Vietnam are examined by using GARCH-types models for time-series data. The findings show that for the 3-year and 5-year government bonds, there are positive relationships between the percentage change of Central Government Balance, Policy Rate change and government bond yields change; while the percentage change of Exchange Rate and VN Index negatively affect government bond yields change. For 10-year government bond, Policy Rate, VN Index, Inflation and VIX are the most significant determinants of the government bond yields. Their changes positively affect bond yields change while Inflation has a negative relationship with government bond yields change. Moreover, Inflation has more significant impact on the change in long-term government bond yields than that in shorter-term government bond yields.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.055
Threshold uncertainty score0.109

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.219
Teacher spread0.187 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Economics and FinanceSame topicMonetary Policy and Economic ImpactFrench-language works237,207