MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4285803699 · doi:10.1089/ten.teb.2022.0018

<i>Ex Vivo</i> Liver Machine Perfusion: Comprehensive Review of Common Animal Models

2022· review· en· W4285803699 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueTissue Engineering Part B Reviews · 2022
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicOrgan Transplantation Techniques and Outcomes
Canadian institutionsToronto General Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEx vivoMachine perfusionLiver transplantationMedicineCold storageTransplantationPerfusionIn vivoEconomic shortageAnimal studiesIntensive care medicineBioinformaticsSurgeryBiologyInternal medicineBiotechnology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The most common preservation technique for liver grafts is static cold storage. Due to the organ shortage for liver transplantation (LT), extended criteria donor (ECD) allografts are increasingly used—despite the higher risk of inferior outcome after transplantation. Ex vivo liver machine perfusion (MP) has been developed to improve the outcome of transplantation, especially with ECD grafts, and is currently under evaluation in clinical trials. We performed a literature search on PubMed and ISI Web of Science to assemble an overview of rodent and porcine animal models of ex vivo liver MP for transplantation, which is essential for the present and future development of clinical liver MP. Hypothermic, subnormothermic, and normothermic MP systems have been successfully used for rat and pig LT. In comparison with hypothermic systems, normothermic perfusion often incorporates a dialysis unit. Moreover, it enables metabolic assessment of liver grafts. Allografts experiencing warm ischemic time have a superior survival rate after MP compared with cold storage alone, irrespective of the temperature used for perfusion. Furthermore, ex vivo MP improves the outcome of regular and ECD liver grafts in animal models. Small and large animal models of ex vivo liver MP are available to foster the further development of this new technology. Impact Statement Ex vivo machine perfusion is an important part of current research in the field of liver transplantation. While evidence for improve storage is constantly rising, the development of future applications such as quality assessment and therapeutic interventions necessitates robust animal models. This review is intended to provide an overview of this technology in common large and small animal models and to give an outlook on future applications. Moreover, we describe developmental steps that can be followed by others, and which can help to decrease the number of animals used for experiments based on the replace, reduce, refine concept.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Systematic review · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.788
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0050.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.093
GPT teacher head0.352
Teacher spread0.259 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it