Transfer Learning-Driven Intrusion Detection for Internet of Vehicles (IoV)
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The Internet of Vehicles (IoV) is a set of connected vehicles supported with sensors, communication technologies, and software connected by the Internet as an infrastructure. With the evolution of 5G technology, automation, and artificial intelligence, the IoV is expected to replace traditional transportation systems in the near future. On the other hand, with this evolution, the possibility of new cyberattacks has increased. This paper proposes a security framework in which intrusion detection secures the Intra/Inter-Vehicular communications within the IoV network. The proposed framework uses multi-task trans-fer learning to transfer knowledge gained from two different benchmark datasets. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first work that uses transfer learning to transfer the knowledge between two different benchmark datasets. The performance of the intrusion detection engine is evaluated using two different deep learning algorithms, namely Deep Neural Network (DNN) and Convolutional Neural Network (CNN), in terms of accuracy, precision, recall and F1-score. In addition to achieving satisfying performance and reduced training/fine-tuning time for the target domains, our analysis illustrates the computational effectiveness of the proposed model by transferring the knowledge from the smaller to the larger dataset.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it