MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4286007932 · doi:10.1155/2022/1716827

Stability Analysis of the New Traffic Flow Lattice Model considering Taillight Effect and Speed Deviation

2022· article· en· W4286007932 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Zhicheng Li, Changxi Ma

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Advanced Transportation · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicTraffic control and management
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNatural Science Foundation of Anhui ProvinceAnhui Provincial Quality Engineering Project
KeywordsTraffic flow (computer networking)Density wave theoryStability (learning theory)Standard deviationFlow (mathematics)DiagramLattice (music)MechanicsCritical ionization velocityStatistical physicsFlow velocityComputer simulationMathematicsPhysicsComputer scienceStatistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A new macroscopic traffic flow lattice model is established which considered the taillight effect and velocity deviation. By combining the concept of critical density, the critical condition of taillight triggering is established. The situation of taillight appearing is fully considered, and the influence of taillight effect is analyzed. Through the stability analysis of the model, the stability conditions of the model are obtained. By nonlinear analysis, the mKdV equation is derived which can describe the evolution mechanism of the density wave. From the phase diagram, we can find that the two factors have a positive impact on the stability of traffic flow. Finally, spatiotemporal evolution of the density wave and cross-section view of the density wave are obtained by numerical simulation to verify the theoretical derivation of this paper. The simulation results show that the stability of traffic flow can be improved by considering taillight effect and speed deviation. In addition, by comparing the time-space evolution maps of different parameter values, it can be found that the stability of traffic flow considering the taillight effect and speed deviation is better than that considering one factor alone. However, the stability of traffic flow will be negatively affected by low speed estimate and high critical density.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.185
Threshold uncertainty score0.247

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.203
Teacher spread0.197 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Advanced TransportationSame topicTraffic control and managementFrench-language works237,207