Exploring the relationship between resting-state intra-network connectivity and accelerometer-measured physical activity in pediatric concussion: a cohort study
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Our objective was to explore the association between resting-state functional connectivity and accelerometer-measured physical activity in pediatric concussion. Fourteen children with concussion (aged 14.54 ± 2.39 years, 8 female) were included in this secondary data analysis of a larger study. Participants had neuroimaging at 15.3 ± 6.7 days postinjury and subsequently a mean of 11.1 ± 5.0 days of accelerometer data. Intra-network connectivity of the default mode network (DMN), sensorimotor network (SMN), salience network (SN), and frontoparietal network (FPN) was computed using resting-state MRI. We found that, per general linear models (GLMs), only intra-network connectivity of the DMN was associated with physical activity levels. More specifically, increased intra-network connectivity of the DMN was significantly associated with higher levels of subsequent accelerometer-measured light physical activity (LPA; F (2, 11) = 7.053, p = 0.011, R a 2 = 0.562; β = 0.469), moderate physical activity (MPA; F (2, 11) = 6.159, p = 0.016, Ra2 = 0.528; β = 0.725), and vigorous physical activity (VPA; F (2, 11) = 10.855, p = 0.002, R a 2 = 0.664; β = 0.792). Intra-network connectivity of the DMN did not significantly predict sedentary time. Therefore, these preliminary findings suggest that there is a positive association between the intra-network connectivity of the DMN and device-measured physical activity in children with concussion.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".