The 2020 Mw 6.5 Monte Cristro Range (Nevada) earthquake: anatomy of a large rupture through a region of highly-distributed faulting
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The 15 May 2020 Mw 6.5 Monte Cristo Range earthquake (MCRE) in Nevada, USA is the largest instrumental event in the Mina deflection, an E-trending stepover zone of highly diffuse faulting within the Walker Lane. The MCRE mostly ruptured previously unmapped faults, motivating us to characterize the behaviour of an earthquake on a structurally-immature fault. We use Interferometric Synthetic Aperture Radar (InSAR) data and regional GNSS offsets to model the causative faulting. Our three fault model indicates almost pure left-lateral motion in the east and normal-sinistral slip in the west. Maximum slip of 1.1 m occurs at 8-10 km depth but less than 0.2 m of slip reaches the surface, yielding a pronounced shallow slip deficit (SSD) of 86%. Our calibrated relocated hypocenters and focal mechanisms indicate that the mainshock initiated at 9 km depth and aftershock focal depths range from 1 to 11 km, helping constrain the local seismogenic thickness. We further present new field observations of fracturing and pebble-clearing that shed light on the western MCRE kinematics, revealing a paired fault system below the spatial resolution of the InSAR model. The segmented fault geometry, off-fault aftershocks with variable mechanisms, distributed surface fractures, limited long-term geomorphic features, and an estimated cumulative offset of 600-700 m, are all characteristic of a structurally-immature fault system. However, the large SSD is not unusual for an earthquake of this magnitude, and a larger compilation of InSAR models (twenty-eight Mw≥6.4 strike-slip events) shows that SSDs are not correlated with structural maturity as previously suggested.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".