MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4286209077 · doi:10.3390/app12147298

Energy Prediction and Energy Management in Kinetic Energy-Harvesting Wireless Sensors Network for Industry 4.0

2022· article· en· W4286209077 on OpenAlexaff
Alex Mouapi, Hatem Mrad

Bibliographic record

VenueApplied Sciences · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicInnovative Energy Harvesting Technologies
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec en Abitibi-TémiscamingueCégep de l'Abitibi Témiscamingue
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWireless sensor networkEnergy harvestingMean squared errorFlexibility (engineering)Automotive engineeringVibrationEngineeringEnergy (signal processing)RangingWirelessReal-time computingComputer scienceTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Real-time control and monitoring are some of the main goals of Industry 4.0. To meet these requirements, sensors are needed at every step of the production process. Wireless sensors (WS) are better suited due to their flexibility but are limited in energy. In this work, kinetic energy harvesting using piezoelectric technologies are considered to ensure the energy autonomy of a Wireless Sensor Network (WSN). First, unlike most existing works, this paper focuses on WSN rather than a single WS since the control of the entirety of most industrial processes requires several WSs. The solution proposed here is based on deep learning of the harvestable power signals at each sensor deployed on the monitoring system. Specifically, vibration measurements were performed at 12 locations on an ore crushing mill in a mine. From there, a mechanical–electrical conversion model considering the system’s dynamics was set up to evaluate the power profile each of the WSs can harvest. Considering that the harvestable power has many peaks due to the different operating states of the engine, we first proposed a Predictor of the Harvestable Power from Vibrations (PHPV). Using a large database, compared to a state-of-the-art predictor, the Predictor of the Harvestable Energy from vibrations (PHEV) allows for significantly reducing the Root Mean Square Error (RMSE). More specifically, the lowest reduction achieved for RSME ranged from 9.4 μW (with PHEV) to 5.9 μW (with PHPV). A decrease in RMSE ranging from 18.45 to 4 μW was obtained for another measurement point. Since harvest rates differ from one location to another, a Hierarchical Energy-Balancing Protocol (HEBP) is proposed to maximize the number of WS capable of transmitting information about the system’s state, thus avoiding an interruption of the network coverage. In the HEBP, it is envisaged that some WSs, besides transmitting data, will supply other nodes with an energy deficit to allow them to communicate information about their location. For a minimum packet size of up to 1100 bits, the energy autonomy of all the WSs is ensured, unlike only 66% of the nodes with the previous protocols.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.394
Threshold uncertainty score0.779

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.211
Teacher spread0.195 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueApplied SciencesSame topicInnovative Energy Harvesting TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207