Bibliographic record
Abstract
Pacific Gateway is a term that evokes the “All Red Route” of fashionable and elegant travel by Canadian Pacific Railway steamers or, less historically, global shipping patterns that have enabled Prince Rupert to post record growth as Canada’s third largest port. But the Pacific Northwest is also notably associated with “White Routes” – forays into polar waters that reflected accessibility and opportunity and that contradicted common notions of Arctic approaches. This article will explore the history of these western approaches, examining European explorers, economic and technological innovations, the impact of climate change, and current geopolitical developments that ensure Canada’s Pacific Gateway will remain significantly northern, as well as westwards, focused. Porte d’entrée du Pacifique est un terme qui évoque la « All Red Route » des voyages élégants et à la mode des bateaux à vapeur du chemin de fer Canadien Pacifique ou, d’un point de vue moins historique, les trajets d’expédition à l’échelle mondiale qui ont permis à Prince Rupert d’afficher une croissance record comme troisième plus grand port du Canada. Mais le Nord-Ouest du Pacifique est aussi particulièrement associé aux « routes blanches », les incursions en eaux polaires qui soulignaient l’accessibilité et les possibilités et qui contredisaient les notions communes d’approches arctiques. Cet article examine l’histoire de ces approches occidentales, notamment les explorateurs européens, les innovations économiques et technologiques, les repercussions des changements climatiques et les évolutions géopolitiques actuelles qui font en sorte que la porte d’entrée Canadienne du Pacifique restera considérablement axée sur le Nord et sur l’Ouest.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.011 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.022 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".