MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4286255742 · doi:10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e09856

Characterization and optimization of the properties of untreated high land bamboo fibres

2022· article· en· W4286255742 on OpenAlexaff
Dawit Tessema Ebissa, Tamrat Tesfaye, Dellele Worku, David Wood

Bibliographic record

VenueHeliyon · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicBamboo properties and applications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsThermogravimetric analysisComposite materialMaterials scienceBambooFourier transform infrared spectroscopyModulusCharacterization (materials science)OpticsChemistryNanotechnology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this experimental study, untreated Ethiopian high land bamboo fibres were characterized and detected the optimal properties. In the investigation, SEM was applied to examine the surface texture of the fibres. The chemical bonds of the molecules (functional groups) were identified by Fourier transform infrared spectra (FTIR). The thermal properties of the fibre were explored with a thermogravimetric analyser, and the results were confirmed by differential thermo-gravimetric analysis (DTG). Mechanical properties were improved using the experimental design principle. The design is based on the RSM methodology three-factor three-level to present mathematical models. At various plant ages, the culm wall thickness in the radial direction and soaking duration of the single fibre is extracted using a roller crusher machine. The operating parameters and optimal mechanical properties were validated using confirmation tests. Breaking force 796.5cN, tenacity 46.8cNtex-1, work done 456cNmm, and modulus 1814cNtex-1 were the optimal mechanical characteristics achieved at the operating parameters 2.0 years age, a calm thickness layer coded values of 0.6 along the radial direction, and 3.8 days soaking time when compared to mechanical properties 1-3 years plant age, calm thickness layers of from primary (-1) to secondary layers (1) along with the radial direction, and 3-9 days soaking time.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.488
Threshold uncertainty score0.160

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.170
Teacher spread0.154 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations14
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHeliyonSame topicBamboo properties and applicationsFrench-language works237,207