Bibliographic record
Abstract
In the review of Islamic legal, Prophet Muhammad's legal politics is an exciting theme to be studied more deeply. The Prophet Muhammad SAW., known as the Ummī (illiterate) Prophet, thus raising the paradigm that the Prophet was not intelligent and capable. The research method was qualitative. This research aimed to prove how the Ummī Prophet was smart, trustworthy, full of wisdom, respected, and legally competent. In some of his legal provisions, even the Prophet PBUH presented a solution to the ilā ākhīr al-zamān. The concept of social justice in upholding human rights, especially women's rights, is aggressively debated. It turned out that 14 centuries ago had been initiated by the Prophet Muhammad through some of the provisions of his sunnah, which required men to protect women and their rights. Likewise, the concept of tolerance and interfaith relations of them have been initiated by the Prophet. Aside from being a leader of the Muslims in history, the Prophet Muhammad was also once a judge in a problem experienced by the infidels and was considered a wise community figure at that time. Even the Prophet SAW., was given the authority to establish new laws for specific issues through his sunnah on matters not determined by their legal provisions in the Qur'an.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".