Cooperative Adaptive Cruise Control using Vehicle-to-Vehicle communication and Deep Learning
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this paper, a cooperative adaptive cruise control (CACC) system is presented with integrated lidar and vehicle-to-vehicle (V2V) communication. Firstly, an adaptive cruise control system (ACC) is designed for the Q-Car electrical vehicle, an autonomous car. Secondly, a CACC system and V2V communication are designed based on a new algorithm to improve the ACC system performance. Lastly, the CACC agent was trained by Deep Q learning (DQN) and tested. The proposed CACC system improved the stability of the vehicle. Experimental results demonstrate that the CACC system can decrease the average inter-vehicular distance of ACC by 44.74%, with an additional 40.19% when DQN was utilized. The vehicles communicate with each other through a WiFi module to transmit information with 1ms latency.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it