MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Rapid access to biomarker data in a community setting: Integration of next-generation sequencing into routine pathologic workflow.

2022· article· en· W4286294460 on OpenAlexafffund
Kirstin Perdrizet, Parneet Cheema, Andrea Beharry, Joanne Diep, Marco Iafolla, William Raskin, Shaan Dudani, Mary Anne Brett, Blerta Starova, Brian Olsen, Brandon S. Sheffield

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Clinical Oncology · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicCancer Genomics and Diagnostics
Canadian institutionsOttawa HospitalUniversity of OttawaWilliam Osler Health SystemUniversity of Toronto
FundersPfizer Canada
KeywordsMedicineBiomarkerTurnaround timeLung cancerOncologyWorkflowBiomarker discoveryCancerInternal medicineDatabaseComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

3143 Background: Biomarker data in the form of next generation sequencing (NGS) are critical to the delivery of precision cancer care. Onsite testing is often limited to large academic centers, requiring smaller community centers to rely on samples send outs. Turnaround time for biomarkers can be lengthy and can adversely affect the delivery of optimal therapy in many tumor types. This study aims to evaluate the feasibility of rapidly delivered comprehensive NGS in a community center using a novel workflow in the laboratory by integrating NGS into the routine immunohistochemistry (IHC) service. Methods: An automated NGS workflow utilizing the Genexus integrated sequencer with the Oncomine precision assay GX (OPA, Thermofisher Scientific), was validated for clinical use and integrated into the routine diagnostic IHC service. During the study period (Oct 2020 – Oct 2021), NGS biomarker data was generated and reported alongside IHC biomarkers where applicable. A retrospective chart review was performed to assess the early experience and performance characteristics of this novel approach to biomarker testing. Results: A total of 578 solid tumor samples underwent genomic profiling. Median turnaround time for biomarker results was 3 business days (IQR 2-5). The majority (n = 481, 83%) of cases were resulted in fewer than 5 business days. Tumor types included lung cancer (n = 310, 54%), melanoma (n = 97, 17%), and colorectal cancer (n = 68, 12%). Specimen types included surgical resections (n = 104, 18%), core biopsies (n = 411, 71%), and cytology specimens (n = 63, 11%). NGS testing detected key driver alterations at expected prevalence rates in respective tumor types; lung EGFR (16%), ALK (3%), RET (1%), melanoma BRAF (43%), colorectal RAS/RAFwild-type (33%), among others. Conclusions: This is the first study demonstrating the clinical feasibility and turnaround time statistics of automated comprehensive NGS performed and interpreted in parallel with diagnostic histopathology and immunohistochemistry in a community setting. This novel approach of integrating biomarkers, IHC, and morphology offers rapid turnaround by removing the need for outsourcing biomarker data. This model could be adopted by other community centers to improve rapid access to biomarker data and therapeutic decision making.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.014
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.017
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.014
Threshold uncertainty score0.075

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0140.017
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.356
GPT teacher head0.472
Teacher spread0.116 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Clinical Oncology→Same topicCancer Genomics and Diagnostics→French-language works237,207→