MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Whose mitochondria are more stable, male or female ones? Response of neurosteroid status of mitochondria of cerebral cortex cells to melanoma development in presense of chronic pain.

2022· article· en· W4286298168 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
И. В. Нескубина, E. M. Frantsiyants, И. В. Каплиева, Alla I. Shikhlya­rova, Е. И. Сурикова, Natalia D. Cheryarina, Valeria A. Bandovkina, Yulia A. Pogorelova, Л. П. Кучкина, Aleksandr V. Snezhko, D. A. Rozenko, Tatiana V. Ausheva, Oleg I. Kit

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Clinical Oncology · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCancer Treatment and Pharmacology
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEstroneInternal medicineEndocrinologyTestosterone (patch)MedicineHormoneCerebral cortexSubcutaneous injection

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

e21559 Background: Gender differences in brain physiology and gender differences in pathology are usually recognized, but often are disregarded in clinical and experimental studies, resulting in numerous inaccuracies in data interpretation. The purpose of this study was to analyze levels of neurosteroid hormones in mitochondria of the cerebral cortex cells in C57BL/6 mice with subcutaneous B16/F10 melanoma growing in presence of chronic neurogenic pain (CNP). Methods: The study included male and female C57BL/6 mice (n = 336) aged 8 weeks initially weighing 21-22 g. Experimental groups were: intact animals; controls with a CNP model created by bilateral sciatic nerve ligation; comparison group 3 weeks after subcutaneous inoculation of 0.5 ml suspension of B16/F10 melanoma cells diluted 1:10; main group 3 weeks after subcutaneous melanoma growth in presence of CNP (CNP+B16/F10). Levels of estradiol (pg/g protein), estrone (pg/g protein) (DBC, Canada); progesterone (ng/g protein), total and free testosterone (pg/g protein) (XEMA, Russia) were measured in mitochondrial samples by ELISA (Tecan Infinite F50 analyzer, Austria). Results: Levels of estradiol in intact females were 3.1 times higher than in males, while estrone, progesterone, total and free testosterone were lower by 6.4, 2.7, 2.0 and 2.5 times, respectively. Only in females with CNP estradiol decreased by 3.4 times, compared to intact values, and estrone increased by 1.7 times (p<0.05), testosterone by 3.9 times. Estradiol in animals with B16/F10 decreased compared with intact values by 3.1 times in females and by 1.5 times in males (p<0.05). Females with B16/F10 showed the highest levels of progesterone exceeding intact values by 3.1 times. In the group with CNP+B16/F10, females showed lower levels of estradiol and estrone (by 1.4 times, p<0.05) and free testosterone (by 1.6 times, p<0.05), compared to the levels in CNP; on the opposite, males had 1.5 times (p<0.05) higher estrone and 2.9 times lower progesterone. Conclusions: Low levels of estradiol involved in the protective mechanism of neurosteroids were the dominant factor in mitochondria of cerebral cortex cells in females with CNP and malignant neoplasms. Males did not demonstrate such dominant factor. In animals with CNP+B16/F10, the response nature of cerebral cortex mitochondria changed: all defense mechanisms in the brain of females were suppressed by the 3rd week of tumor development in presence of pain. In males, mitochondria of cerebral cortex cells were more resistant to the influence of two pathologies, and only few changes in the neurosteroid status were recorded.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.091
GPT teacher head0.431
Teacher spread0.340 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Clinical OncologySame topicCancer Treatment and PharmacologyFrench-language works237,207