MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4286298924 · doi:10.1103/physreve.105.064109

Effects of structural inhomogeneity on equilibration processes in Langevin dynamics

2022· article· en· W4286298924 on OpenAlexafffund
Omid Mozafar, Colin Denniston

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical review. E · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicSpectroscopy and Quantum Chemical Studies
Canadian institutionsWestern University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCompute Canada
KeywordsLangevin dynamicsPhysicsRelaxation (psychology)Molecular dynamicsLangevin equationStatistical physicsCoupling (piping)HomogeneousLimit (mathematics)Canonical ensembleDistribution functionFunction (biology)Quantum mechanicsMaterials scienceMathematicsMathematical analysisMonte Carlo method

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In recent decades, computer experiments have led to an accurate and fundamental understanding of atomic and molecular mechanisms in fluids, such as different kinds of relaxation processes toward steady physical states. In this paper, we investigate how exactly the configuration of initial states in a molecular-dynamics simulation can affect the rates of decay toward equilibrium for the widely known Langevin canonical ensemble. For this purpose, we derive an original expression relating the system relaxation time τ_{sys} and the radial distribution function g(r) in the near-zero and high-density limit. We found that, for an initial state which is slightly marginally inhomogeneous in the number density of atoms, the system relaxation time τ_{sys} is much longer than that for the homogeneous case and an increasing function of the Langevin coupling constant, γ. We also found, during structural equilibration, g(r) at large distances approaches 1 from above for the inhomogeneous case and from below for the macroscopically homogeneous one.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.583
Threshold uncertainty score0.325

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.305
Teacher spread0.298 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2022
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysical review. ESame topicSpectroscopy and Quantum Chemical StudiesFrench-language works237,207