MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4286423571 · doi:10.11646/zootaxa.5168.3.9

Larval morphology of the Neotropical diving beetle genus Hemibidessus Zimmermann, 1921 (Coleoptera: Dytiscidae: Bidessini)

2022· article· en· W4286423571 on OpenAlexaff
Mariano C. Michat, Yves Alarie, César J. Benetti

Bibliographic record

VenueZootaxa · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicColeoptera Taxonomy and Distribution
Canadian institutionsLaurentian University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSetaBiologyDytiscidaeAppendageInstarLarvaGenusZoologyAnatomyMorphology (biology)ChaetotaxyEcology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We describe for the first time the larva of the diving-beetle genus Hemibidessus Zimmermann, 1921, based on instars II and III of H. conicus (Zimmermann, 1921). We include detailed morphometric and chaetotaxic analyses of the cephalic capsule, head appendages, legs, last abdominal segment and urogomphi in order to discover useful characters for distinguishing Hemibidessus larvae from those of other known Bidessini. Hemibidessus larvae characteristically have elongate legs armed with natatory setae and elongate urogomphi that bear numerous secondary setae, features commonly associated with an increased swimming ability. These characters are shared with Brachyvatus Zimmermann, 1921, suggesting a close phylogenetic relationship between these two genera. The primary seta UR8 is inserted apically on urogomphomere 2 in Hemibidessus larvae, a feature so far only shared with the mature larva of Yola Gozis, 1886. Other characters that combined with those previously mentioned are useful to distinguish Hemibidessus from other bidessines are the absence of a ventroapical spinula on antennomere 3 and the presence of secondary dorsal setae on protarsus.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.403
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.211
Teacher spread0.194 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZootaxaSame topicColeoptera Taxonomy and DistributionFrench-language works237,207