Bibliographic record
Abstract
fixxion française contemporaine sont mis à disposition selon les termes de la licence Creative Commons Attribution -Pas d'Utilisation Commerciale -Pas de Modification 4.0 International. Emmanuel Bove's Bécon-les-Bruyères (1927)Alison James les terrains incultes où [les bruyères] poussaient... (BB 3) 1 Emmanuel Bove's Bécon-les-Bruyères first appeared in the literary magazine Europe in May 1927, before its publication the following month with the Éditions Émile-Paul Frères in the collection "Portraits de la France".Born in 1898, Bove was by this point known as the author of two novels, Mes Amis (1924) and Armand (1927), as well as the novellas Visite d'un soir (1925), and Le crime d'une nuit (1926) 1 . 2Edited by Jean-Louis Vaudoyer and commissioned from writers such as François Mauriac, Pierre Mac Orlan, and Francis Jammes, the 34 volumes in the "Portraits de la France" series generally describe well-known towns and cities (Bordeaux, Marseille, Deauville) or regions (Basses-Pyrénées, Haute-Provence) 2 .Like these other books, Bove's Bécon-les-Bruyères is produced in a high-quality limited edition, on vellum paper with an artistic frontispiece (in this case by Maurice Utrillo).Unlike them, it deals with a marginal locality situated on the northwestern outskirts of Paris, at the junction between Asnières and Courbevoie, which is barely a place at all: "Bécon-les-Bruyères existe à peine" 3 .Bove's choice of this site for his literary portrait of France may be due in part, as some have suggested, to his instinct for provocation 4 .Yet Bécon-les-Bruyères is not merely a satirical or derisive portrait of the nondescript banlieue.In 63 pages and seven short chapters, Bove develops a curious travel narrative that constantly tests the explorer's expectations against the challenge of the ordinary.To reread Bécon-les-Bruyères today is to discover a pioneering and idiosyncratic instance of literary fieldwork. Name and (Non-)Place 3The incongruity of Bécon-les-Bruyères derives in the first instance from the place name itself, which is at once "printanier" in its reference (BB 5) and "teinté de vulgarité", Emmanuel Bove's Bécon-les-Bruyères (1927) Revue critique de fixxion française contemporaine, 18 | 2019
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.007 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.022 | 0.005 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".