High-resolution simulations of chromatin folding at genomic rearrangements in malignant B cells provide mechanistic insights into proto-oncogene deregulation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Genomic rearrangements are known to result in proto-oncogene deregulation in many cancers, but the link to 3D genome structure remains poorly understood. Here, we used the highly predictive heteromorphic polymer (HiP-HoP) model to predict chromatin conformations at the proto-oncogeneCCND1in healthy and malignant B cells. After confirming that the model gives good predictions of Hi-C data for the nonmalignant human B cell–derived cell line GM12878, we generated predictions for two cancer cell lines, U266 and Z-138. These possess genome rearrangements involvingCCND1and the immunoglobulin heavy locus (IGH), which we mapped using targeted genome sequencing. Our simulations showed that a rearrangement in U266 cells where a singleIGHsuper-enhancer is inserted next toCCND1leaves the local topologically associated domain (TAD) structure intact. We also observed extensive changes in enhancer-promoter interactions within the TAD, suggesting that it is the downstream chromatin remodeling which gives rise to the oncogene activation, rather than the presence of the inserted super-enhancer DNA sequence per se. Simulations of theIGH-CCND1reciprocal translocation in Z-138 cells revealed that an oncogenic fusion TAD is created, encompassingCCND1and theIGHsuper-enhancers. We predicted how the structure and expression ofCCND1changes in these different cell lines, validating this using qPCR and fluorescence in situ hybridization microscopy. Our work demonstrates the power of polymer simulations to predict differences in chromatin interactions and gene expression for different translocation breakpoints.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".