Bibliographic record
Abstract
Negli anni Settanta i caratteri del femminismo italiano variano molto da una città all’altra, poiché rispecchiano le differenze di storia sociale, politica e culturale. All’interno del movimento delle donne sono nati vari gruppi e si parla di “femminismi”. Questi gruppi hanno prodotto testimonianza di sé attraverso pubblicazioni di riviste, a volte numeri unici. Temi comuni: la salute, la conoscenza del proprio corpo, la contraccezione, l’IVG, i consultori, i servizi sociali. Temi che hanno segnato differenze: emancipazione/liberazione, specificità/uguaglianza, salario per il lavoro domestico, lavoro retribuito. In Emilia, terra di emancipazione e lavoro femminile, i Gruppi per il Salario al Lavoro Domestico hanno avuto vita breve e limitata come partecipazione. In altre realtà Padova e Napoli le donne impegnate nella campagna per il salario domestico hanno espresso voci più forti e durature.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.005 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".