MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4286522267 · doi:10.4000/episteme.14823

Visages de la bergère dans les broadside ballads

2022· article· fr· W4286522267 on OpenAlexaff
Chantal Schütz

Bibliographic record

VenueÉtudes Épistémè · 2022
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicHistorical and Literary Studies
Canadian institutionsSt. Thomas Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArtBalladHumanitiesBroadsideLiteraturePoetry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

L’une des traces matérielles de la pénétration de la pastorale dans toutes les couches sociales est constituée par les nombreuses feuilles volantes anglaises (broadside ballads) qui mettent souvent en scène des dialogues chantés entre berger et bergère. Dans la broadside ballad pastorale, la matérialité est représentée avant tout par la multimodalité de l’objet feuille volante, à la fois discours poétique, musical et visuel, et par ses transformations physiques à mesure que cet objet est composé, fabriqué, diffusé puis réédité. Trois types de feuilles volantes pastorales sont ici abordées : l’élégie, le dialogue et la pastorale comique, où la bergère ne se limite pas à une vision bucolique d’amours exaltées mais donne au contraire corps et voix à des personnages féminins moins idéalisés que dans les textes courtois.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.896
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.280
Teacher spread0.263 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueÉtudes ÉpistémèSame topicHistorical and Literary StudiesFrench-language works237,207